Nail the essentials: How can a building be Smart? What is the Smart Readiness Indicator?

The SRI provides a common language for building stakeholders (owners, designers, solution providers, policy actors, etc.) to discuss how to make buildings smarter, and what benefits this will bring. There are 9 technical domains and 7 impact criteria for the SRI assessment.

Assessing buildings according to a scale of smartness: a new paradigm in the building sector.

Using smart technologies in buildings can be a cost-effective way to assist in creating healthier and more comfortable buildings with lower energy use and carbon emissions. For instance:

  1. Digital technologies such as smart thermostats and lighting control can pay back within 2 years.
  2. Smart technologies, such as automated sun shading control or ventilation control based on air-quality sensors, can also improve health, well-being and comfort
  3. Intelligent scheduling of energy consumption (white goods, electric vehicles, etc.) can result in significant energy savings, and at the same time it contributes to grid balancing.
Illustration of a smart home with energy optimization, local energy storage, automatic maintenance, and improved resident comfort
Illustration showing a smart home system with features like energy use optimization, local green energy storage, automatic diagnosis and maintenance prediction, and improved comfort for residents via automation.

To promote the use of smart building technologies, the Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI), a common EU framework for rating the smart readiness of buildings, was introduced in the last 2018 revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). The SRI provides a common language for building stakeholders (owners, designers, solution providers, policy actors, etc.) to discuss how to make buildings smarter, and what benefits this will bring.

The rating aims to measure the “smartness” of a building, intended as the ability of a building to sense, interpret, communicate, and respond efficiently to changing conditions. 

How to obtain a SRI

For the experts involved in the SRI journey, it has been paramount to be methodologically consistent as well as easily understandable and accessible also for non-expert building users. Hence, the SRI mainly originates from the European standard EN 15232–1 “Energy performance of buildings – Impact of automation and of technical management on the energy consumption of buildings”. Further adaptations and integrations have been made.

To obtain the SRI of a building, 3 are the key functionalities that are considered: 

  • the operation of technical building systems; 
  • the external environment (including energy grids);
  • the demands from building occupants.

The level of the building capability to optimize energy efficiency and overall in-use performance, the level of building adaptation to the needs of the occupant and to the signals from the energy grid (as energy flexibility) determines the  SRI rating.

The 9 technical domains assessed by the rating are: heating; cooling; domestic hot water; ventilation; lighting; dynamic building envelope; electricity; electric vehicle charging; monitoring, and control.

Linked to the key functionalities, there are 7 impact criteria: energy efficiency and maintenance and fault prediction are linked to the first key functionality – how the building optimize energy efficiency and in-use performance; comfort, convenience, health well-being and accessibility, information to occupants are connected to the second key functionality – how the building adapts its operation to the needs of the occupants; last, the energy flexibility and storage criteria are linked to the key functionality –  how the building adapt to the signals from the grid – energy flexibility.

How does it work? An assessor rates each building according to the 9 domains and the 7 impact criteria. The sum of domain and impact scores provides the total SRI rating. 

More information can be found on the EU online forum that supports and monitors the implementation of the SRI in Europe: navigate through the SRI hub and read the factsheet on the SRI.

Listen to Prof. Paris Fokaides in his Expert Talk organized by EU BUILD.

Read more about the project

Or subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated with the latest developments of our projects.

By clicking Sign Up you’re confirming that you agree with our Terms and Conditions.

SmarterEPC

Integrating Energy Performance and Smart Readiness Indicator: Insights from assessors

SmarterEPC surveyed 25 building performance assessors to test the integration of Energy Performance Certificates with Smart Readiness Indicator assessments. The SmarterEPC methodology promises to streamline building audits under the revised EPBD, but assessors emphasise the need for clearer criteria, practical training, and digital tools to ensure successful implementation across Europe. Read what we found out.

Read More »
Observe

Some news from CIEMAT !

On 4 and 5 November, the 2nd URBAN MOME Network Conference was held in Barcelona under the theme “Towards efficient urban environments through modelling, measurement and control in the built environment.” CIEMAT participated through its Building Energy Efficiency R&D Unit, presenting the European OBSERVE project and reaffirming its leading role within the URBAN MOME Network. Coordinated by CIEMAT, the Network provides a platform for knowledge exchange on modelling, measurement and control in the building sector, with the objective of improving

Read More »
EPCs in Italy
SmarterEPC

The state of the EPCs in Italy: progress and challenges

The Energy Performance Certificate (EPC), introduced in Italy in 2005 with the 2002 EPBD Directive, is a fundamental tool for building management for owners, operators, and institutions alike. Aside from the benefits, what is the current state of EPCs in Italy? Every year, ENEA publishes a report on EPCs to analyze the state of the art of this certification, which is still not fully exploited in all its potential.

Read More »
Observe

Some news from ENEA

Over the past months, ENEA has been contributing to the OBSERVE project by supporting the development of a structured assessment approach to describe national building data ecosystems and inform the definition of national Building Stock Observatories (nBSO) archetypes and their key functional building blocks. ENEA has been actively involved in stakeholder engagement activities, including the collection and evaluation of inputs from national stakeholders and European policymakers. These efforts help improve the understanding of institutional needs and current practices related to

Read More »
Observe

Some news from Eurac Research

Over the past months, Eurac Research has contributed to stakeholder engagement strategies and participated in knowledge-sharing activities, including presenting synergies with related initiatives.  In parallel, we have supported the mapping of building stock data and carried out policy analysis for Deliverables D2.1 and D2.2 (project deliverables focusing on stakeholder needs) and requirements for establishing national Building Stock Observatories, and on policies and existing tools at national and EU level, respectively ensuring alignment with EU frameworks and Member State priorities.  These

Read More »
Observe

Some news from Euphyia Tech LTD

“Over the last months we had contacted Ministry of Energy Commerce and Industry of Cyprus to introduce our project and the roadmap, provide them the WP2 and WP4 questionnaires and cooperate to receive help from the lead public authority regarding our project. We had a meeting and after the meeting we received feedback from our official authority.  We received feedback with completed questionnaires and comments for projects roadmap for Cyprus and updated the partners accordingly. The comments were; Key remarks

Read More »